THE FRACTAL PRINCE by Hannu Rajaniemi — a Review

THE FRACTAL PRINCE is the follow-up to Hannu Rajaniemi’s THE QUANTUM THIEF, and, like its predecessor, is a complex, fast-paced tale of gentleman thief Jean le Flambeur battling gods in a post-singularity world that only a mathematician or physicist will feel completely comfortable. But this time, Rajaniemi adds a layer of Arabian Nights and the power of stories to this hard-SF tale.

As you can probably guess from that first paragraph, THE FRACTAL PRINCE is not the easiest read. There is a reason all discussions of a post-singularity Earth tend to peter out into statements along the line of “It will be so unlike our current world,” or “We cannot imagine that future world.” Rajaniemi does an admirable job of trying to avoid such statements and describe a world of humanity with AI-enhanced brains, omnipresent nano-materials, and uploadable consciousnesses. It’s a difficult read, and I found myself at times confused and having to go back and re-read portions of the book.

But despite these difficulties, at its heart, Rajaniemi has written a beautiful story about the power of stories and the extremes to which people will go for love, honor, and family. So THE FRACTAL PRINCE isn’t so foreign after all. It’s just not easy on the readers. That being said, it is also wonderfully written. It’s downright poetic at times–a rare thing among hard-SF novels.

In this book, the second of a proposed trilogy (and do not pick up this book without having read THE QUANTUM THIEF), le Flambeur returns to a damaged Earth on assignment from a goddess. With him again is Mieli and her living ship Perhonen. His job? To break into the mind of a living god to steal codes that would allow him to manipulate reality on the quantum level. If he succeeds, he might earn his freedom. But a gentleman thief always has his own ideas, plans, and goals. While on Earth, he meets sisters who are struggling to survive a revolution that may bring about Earth’s demise.

THE FRACTAL PRINCE moves quickly, if not smoothly. The book takes place over two timelines that don’t meet up perfectly. Subplots are often told as stories within stories, leading to other complications. The ending has an almost epic scale, yet it feels rushed, cramming in so much action and important knowledge. Nevertheless, I enjoyed this book. Part hard-SF, part heist, part fairy tale, THE FRACTAL PRINCE will reward the patient reader with a story unlike anything he or she is likely to have read before.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

A Sci Fi Free, Slow Book Manifesto? Not So Fast

Yesterday, The Atlantic posted an article by Maura Kelly in which she advocated for everyone to read for at least 30 minutes a day. It’s a beautiful call to action. It’s just a shame she tried to steer readers clear of sci fi, fantasy, and other non-literary genres, even going so far as to use science to try to justify her snobbish and misguided argument.

Specifically, Kelly began her argument by saying

In our leisure moments, whenever we have down time, we should turn to literature—to works that took some time to write and will take some time to read, but will also stay with us longer than anything else. They’ll help us unwind better than any electronic device—and they’ll pleasurably sharpen our minds and identities, too.

She summed up her idea by paraphrasing Michael Pollan, saying, “Read books. As often as you can. Mostly classics.”

While Kelly makes an exception for using an e-reader, she stresses that non-literary books should be avoided. Why?

By playing with language, plot structure, and images, it challenges us cognitively even as it entertains. It invites us to see the world in a different way, demands that we interpret unusual descriptions, and pushes our memories to recall characters and plot details.

She then goes on to refer to one study that said reading stimulates your brain and another that said reading a story by Kafka stimulated your brain more than reading a summary of the story. She then cites two psychologists who believe reading fiction helps us hone our social skills.

I’m all for reading. I’m usually working my way through several books at any given time, and I wish people would read more. But I go nuts when I see this sort of dismissal of “non-literary fiction,” i.e. sci fi, fantasy, horror, westerns, etc. First off, Kelly’s cited studies do not distinguish among genres of fiction. Second, the idea that sci fi and fantasy do not play with language, plot structure, and images is ludicrous. The words robotics, genetic engineering, deep space, and zero-g were all invented in sci fi. Ever used the phrase “newspeak”? Sci fi again (although 1984 has probably moved into the “classics” category now, despite the genre fictions origins). Did she not read The Quantum Thief by Hannu Rajaniemi? How about anything by China Mieville? Talk about mental stimulation.

And don’t get me wrong. People should read the classics. Books that remain in the public conscious for hundreds of years do so because they are smart, wonderful, beautiful things. Read the classics, learn from them, and grow as a person because of them. But the idea that classics and only classics can provide stimulation is nonsense. I would put the best of sci fi and fantasy against the best of literary fiction any day of the week. I think Kelly should too. Perhaps she should rephrase: “Read books. As often as you can. Aim for the best in every genre.”

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email