Talent? Forget It; Focus on Practice

Yesterday, I was feeling a little down. I’m retooling a short story, and all I could hear was my internal critic trashing it. So I was primed for a bunch of articles about talent versus practice. These articles kicked me in the butt and got me working again. It’s funny, though. I didn’t expect a story about Rome to start me down the butt-kicking path.

Yesterday, Wired posted a great article about James Erwin. You may not have heard of him yet, but chances are, you soon will. It looks like Erwin may be one of the next people to jump from internet famous to famous-famous. Erwin’s story began on the website Reddit.com. If you are not familiar, Reddit allows users (Redditors) to vote posts up or down, so the most popular things rise to the top. Often, these are funny pictures, silly videos, or random questions. One day, a Redditor posted the question, “Could I destroy the entire Roman Empire during the reign of Augustus if I traveled back in time with a modern U.S. Marine infantry battalion or MEU [Marine Expeditionary Unit]?” This question proved very popular (eventually becoming a subreddit Rome Sweet Rome), and it caught Erwin’s attention. As an aside, I will say I was lurking in that thread, and watching it unfold was as exciting as Wired would have you believe. The idea of Marines taking on Rome was a fun idea to play with.

Erwin started posting snippets of a response in story form, and then he got a lot of attention. From the Wired article:

Within an hour, he was an online celebrity. Within three hours, a film producer had reached out to him. Within two weeks, he was offered a deal to write a movie based on his Reddit comments. Within two months, he had taken a leave from his job to become a full-time Hollywood screenwriter.

Erwin just so happened to be a writer and a historian, both of fallen empires and U.S. military history. He was in a great position to write about Marines fighting Rome. But before you write it off as Erwin just being in the right place at the right time, read the Wired article.

You see, Erwin was able to produce quality text very quickly only because he had put in a ton of practice. He had created a website, Footnotes to History, an “atlas of strange and tiny nations.” “In 2006 he published Declarations of Independence, a comprehensive account of American secessionist movements, from the Cherokee Nation to the Artists’ Republic of Fremont.” And “in 2009 he [began writing the] Encyclopedia of U.S. Military Actions…an exhaustive [two-volume] description of every single American war, quasi war, occupation, landing, and expedition.” Not only that, but every one of Erwin’s previous posts on Reddit had been instantly critiqued and voted on. To get attention, he would have to be good. Erwin had spent years practicing, developing his ability to write quickly and well. And it’s the result of that practice that caught the agent’s eye: “I knew it was something special, because it wasn’t like he took three months to do this. This was quick quick quick, and it was all good.”

I’ve posted before about keeping your butt in the chair, but Erwin’s story caught my eye because I didn’t know about his past. You see, when it comes to writing, it’s not about talent. It’s about practice. Can you keep writing, keep submitting, and keep going despite the criticism and rejection? Can you do it for years? Because the evidence is mounting that this is exactly what it takes. Forget talent; focus on practice.

But it’s not just me or Malcolm Gladwell saying you need to put in thousands of hours. Scientific studies are also saying focus on practice, not talent. Check out this post on Myke Cole’s blog:

What he did find was a ton of statistically significant data that supported the idea that focused practice/training could result in expertise. ‘I won’t say that there’s no such thing as talent,’ he said, ‘but I will say that it’s irrelevant.

It’s not about having a natural talent for writing. It’s about whether you can keep working. It’s about overcoming excuses and keeping your butt in the chair. Looks like I need to may need to re-read Pressfield’s THE WAR OF ART for further butt-kicking. As soon as I hit my daily wordcount quota, of course.

Good luck, everyone. No, wait. Just keep writing.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

“The Book Job”–The Simpsons Make an Instant-Classic

I’ll be honest. I haven’t watched The Simpsons in a long time. I tend to prefer the older re-runs, even though I know nearly every line by heart. I grew up with it (I believe if Bart had aged in real time, he and I would be about the same age), enjoying the satire. But, having been on so long, the show didn’t seem as funny or as sharp as it used to. The torch had passed to South Park, whose production schedule is so much faster that it can crank out its satire in a far more timely fashion. But the most recent episode, “The Book Job,” was a return to form for The Simpsons. If you didn’t watch it or DVR it, you can watch it online here beginning November 29, 2011.

I DVR’d the episode because Neil Gaiman was doing a cameo. I was pleasantly surprised to see that it wasn’t just a one-liner. Gaiman was a minor character, appearing throughout the episode. I was even happier to see references to everything from Harry Potter, Malcolm Gladwell, and even a classic Far Side comic.

Early in the episode, Lisa is dismayed to discover the woman she thought wrote some of her favorite books was only an actor hired by a publishing house to be the face of a book turned out by marketers (Apparently this episode was inspired by a New Yorker article about shows like Gossip Girl and Vampire Diaries that supposedly hire creatives to churn out material that will reflect the market research performed on tweens). Realizing there is a fortune to be made in writing tween fiction, Homer and Bart form a gang Ocean’s 11-style. Lisa, ever-disagreeing with Homer and Bart’s schemes, decides to sit down and write a more personal, more authentic book of her own.

While brainstorming ideas that will be most appealing to tweens, the gang runs into bestselling-author Neil Gaiman. He’s happy to join their gang, despite being told his job is to get everyone lunch and to ditch the English accent. The gang goes on to write the biggest piece of tween-bait, while Lisa becomes the stereotypical poser-writer, never getting beyond page one.

The gang meets with a publisher (voiced by Ocean’s 11 baddie Andy Garcia) who offers them a cool $1 million once they find a fake author. Enter Lisa, who is now desperate to be an author. The catch? The publisher wants to change everything. So the gang decides to break in and swap out the book’s file with that of their original work. I won’t spoil it here, but the ending has a great heist finale, complete with crosses and double-crosses.

The episode was perfectly timed, airing the same weekend the latest Twilight movie opened. It effectively skewered not only heist movies, but YA novels, publishing, and writing. And while it sounds like the episode might have spread itself too thin, it was actually very joke-filled and well-structured. The plot moved along quickly with great verbal and visual gags, especially in the background (You’ll be pausing the episode throughout to read the fake book titles briefly shown). If you’re a fan of “kid-lit,” writing, Gaiman, or the older, sharper Simpsons, you’ll love it.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email