The World’s End Trailer–the Cornetto Trilogy Comes to a Close

The theatrical trailer for “The World’s End,” has been released. It’s the third movie in the Cornetto trilogy–the humor/genre mashups starring Simon Pegg and Nick Frost and directed by Edgar Wright that has included Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. It stars trilogy regulars Pegg, Frost, Paddy Considine, and Rosamund Pike, as well as Martin Freeman (who while not new, gets bumped up to a major role). What starts out as a bar crawl/midlife crisis turns into a disaster movie when a town is taken over by robots.

I thoroughly enjoyed the mix of humor and genre-based easter eggs found in Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, so I can’t help but think I will enjoy this one too. What do you think?

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

Two New Trailers

Two new trailers were released yesterday. One you have probably seen by now, and it’s the first trailer for Ender’s Game (staring Ben Kingsley, Harrison Ford, Abigail Breslin, Asa Butterfield, Hailee Steinfeld, and Viola Davis, among others). It’s a sci-fi action piece based on a bestselling novel you probably read when younger. At least I hope you did. Check it out.

io9.com had a great breakdown of the trailer, if you want to pick it apart. I thought it was a pretty good trailer, great for introducing people unfamiliar with the book to the Battle School, the kids, and the war. We’ll see if later previews get into the more psychological/emotional aspects of the film (assuming they carry over from the book).

The second trailer is for the third installment of spoofs starring Simon Pegg and Nick Frost and directed by Edgar Wright. Where as Shaun of the Dead took on zombies, and Hot Fuzz took on action movies, this one is a riff on apocalypse movies, complete with a shortcut over fences (well, sort of).

I’m a big fan of the first two, so I’m looking forward to this one. Although it looks like aliens or monsters, not just the end of the world? Hard to tell. Doesn’t really matter though. That trio, plus Martin Freeman as a main character? I’m sold.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

My Review of The Hobbit at 48 FPS

I finally got a chance to see The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey yesterday, and I saw it in 3D IMAX at the High Frame Rate (HFR) of 48 Frames per Second (FPS). I’ll cover the story first, then I’ll get to the tech side of it.

I liked The Hobbit. It’s not as great as The Lord of the Rings movies, but I don’t know if it’s supposed to be. It’s not quite as epic in scope, and I think this story is more about fun than good vs. evil. On that count, it succeeds.

I had two big concerns going into this movie. First, I was a little worried that it would be slow or padded ever since I heard Peter Jackson was going to turn the Hobbit into a trilogy. While there are some slower lulls in the movie, I never got bored. It also takes a while to get going, but once the pieces are in place, it’s quite the adventure.

Second, I was also a bit worried that the action sequences would be repetitive ever since I heard Leonard Maltin say The Hobbit basically boiled down to walking, fight some monsters, walking, fight some monsters, walking, and fight some more monsters. I guess you could describe the movie that way, but it seems somewhat cynical. Each of the action sequences had their own interesting details. In particular the fight and flight scene with the goblins is wild and creative–I found myself wondering how Jackson originally described the sequences to his effects crew.

I think the biggest reason my concerns melted away was the charm of this movie. There is lightheartedness, fun, and heart that save the quiet moments from being boring and give some of the action sequences a nice touch of humor. It’s a great fairy tale movie for the holiday season, and perfect for the family.

Martin Freeman is perfectly cast as Bilbo Baggins. His mannerisms, his delivery, and his awkwardness were wonderfully suited for the character. And the dwarves were great as well. I mean, c’mon, who didn’t want more Gimli? These dwarves show the audience a lot more detail of dwarvish life, even if the 12 of them do sometimes blend together a bit. And I’d be lying if I didn’t walk out of the theater humming “Misty Mountain.”

But, frankly, I would have paid my price of admission for the riddle scene alone. I don’t want to spoil anything about that scene, because it really must be seen for yourself, but be sure to compare Gollum in this movie to The Lord of the Rings films. Not only is he more richly detailed, but he’s also a bit younger, saner, and softer. Not quite as broken as he is later. But close. It’s a classic scene, and I think the cast and crew should be very proud of it.

And now for the tech side of it. The 3D was smoother, and I didn’t get a headache In the past I have felt small headaches during the movie, but nothing so debilitating that I considered leaving. I usually avoid 3D because of the increased price, unless it’s a big spectacle. Like this or Avatar or something. To be honest, I don’t always notice it, as I get absorbed into the movie. I guess that’s a sign that they did things right. But, I know. You want to hear about the HRF.

Remember the first time you saw HDTV? How everything looked a little like a soap opera? Well, yeah, it’s a bit like that. This isn’t a bad thing, in my opinion. Just different. You see things more crisply, with more detail. But it might pull you out of the movie at times.

What really bothered me was that because things were so sharply displayed, it made the division between practical effects and rendered effects all the more apparent to me. At times, the action sequences seemed as if they were flipping back and forth between soap opera close ups and cartoons. Don’t get me wrong. The visual effects were exciting and should be seen on a big screen, but a little of the magic was lost. It was almost as if the sharpness of the display had outpaced the effects.

So is it worth searching out a theater that offers The Hobbit at 48FPS? Yeah, probably. If only to see the differences. I do wonder if I saw it at a slower rate if the effects would simply look fuzzy or if they would blend in a bit bitter. Anyway, regardless of which frame rate you see, I’d definitely recommend The Hobbit. It might not earn Jackson an armful of Oscars like The Lord of the Rings movies, but I think it’s big, it’s fun, and it’s 3 hours well spent.

P.S. The nine minutes of Star Trek: Into the Darkness got me really excited about that too. Far more so than the actual previews.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

Why, CBS, Why Or On “Elementary”

Today, CBS released the first official pic of Johnny Lee Miller and Lucy Liu as Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Joan Watson, as set in modern-day New York City. The very idea makes me angry, and the pic only makes it worse. Really–could they put Liu and Miller in more plaid? C’mon.

Sherlock is not an American character. Point one. Moreover, Steven Moffat is currently making an AMAZING modern-day Sherlock TV show starring Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman. Point two. Moffat’s Sherlock is incredibly well done, but it airs on PBS in America, and each season only contains three 90-minute episodes, which would never fly on American TV.

So what do we do? We take something lovely and ruin it, just like almost every other British import. So forget about CBS. Go get your hands on Moffat’s Sherlock and really sink your teeth into something wonderful. But knowing my luck, Elementary will turn into yet another CBS mega hit (that, somehow, no one I know will admit to watching–just like every other CBS “hit”). Ugh. Please, go watch the British Sherlock. You can thank me later.

However, all that being said, Cumberbatch and Miller recently starred in a stage production of Frankenstein for the British National Theater. It was directed by Danny Boyle, and videos of the performance are being shown around the US. Do some research and look for it. The two actors switch roles (Dr. Frankenstein and the monster), so try to see both if you can. I only saw the Miller-as-Dr.-Frankenstein performance, but I would love to see the other. It’s really quite good.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

Teaser for Season 2 of the BBC’s Sherlock Holmes

I didn’t intend for today to become video-clip day, but here we are. Here is a link to the trailer for the second season of the BBC’s modern day Sherlock.

I can’t wait for season 2. Sherlock is played by Bennedict Cumberbatch, a great actor who you can also see in the new film Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. Watson is played by Martin Freeman, who you might remember as Tim from the British Office, or as Bilbo Baggins if you watched the Hobbit trailer earlier today. The show is run by Steven Moffat, the incredible showrunner of Doctor Who. Moffat has done a wonderful job of modernizing the stories (Watson is still an Afghanistan vet–and odd coincidence) while also keeping the episodes very funny. And if you missed season 1 of Sherlock, don’t fret, it was only 3 episodes, and you can stream it from Netflix.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email