WRITING TO SELL by Scott Meredith — a Review

As I posted a few days back, writer Peter V. Brett blogged that he was a fan of the book WRITING TO SELL by Scott Meredith. He used it as a guide to getting his fantastic debut novel THE WARDED MAN published. I also quoted from WRITING TO SELL yesterday when discussing Meredith’s ideas about plotting a novel if you want a quick peek.

WRITING TO SELL is a perfect name for this book. It’s about how to write a book that will attract the attention of an editor or publisher and result in a contract for the writer. In case you have never heard of Scott Meredith, he is a literary agent, and founder of the Scott Meredith Literary Agency. His clients included incredible writers like Richard S. Prather, Morris West, Norman Mailer, J.G. Ballard, Arthur C. Clarke, P.G. Wodehouse and Philip K. Dick. So the man knows quite a bit about how to write and publish a book.

WRITING TO SELL is broken down into four parts. In the first part, “The Business Facts,” Meredith offers new writers a glimpse behind the curtain, so that they can better understand what agents and publishers do. He also offers advice on how you should start your writing career on the right foot, and how to establish a writing routine. When it comes to the business side of writing, a lot of this information (and more up-to-date information) is available on the internet. As for routines, I agree with what Meredith advises (outline before hand, write your first draft as best as you can, etc.), but I also realize that a writing routine can be a very personal thing, affected by your tastes and a number of other things going on in your life.

The second part, “The Planning and Plotting Facts,” is about plotting a novel and storytelling mechanics. The third part, “The Writing Facts” offers advice on some of the finer points of writing a novel. These two parts are the most valuable portion of WRITING TO SELL. They are short and direct, and every bit is full of solid advice. This portion will definitely reward re-reading.

The fourth and final part, “The Finished-Product Facts,” is about editing your novel and how to publish your novel. Yes, some agents and publishers now prefer to be contacted via e-mail than snail mail, but overall, this section is great, particularly in telling new writers what NOT to do.

WRITING TO SELL was originally written in 1950, so yes, the book is a bit outdated. Yes, there are references to typewriters and good housewives preparing warm meals for the husbands, but don’t let that distract you. Meredith reminds writers to take care of their equipment and to only offer professional looking manuscripts. He also gives advice about balancing your writing with the rest of your life. Although the context may be old-fashioned, the spirit of the advice is timeless. This is a book that all beginner novelists should read.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

New Total Recall Trailer Answers Your Most Important Question, Guys

I’m a big fan of Philip K. Dick stories, but the movies they inspire tend to be hit or miss. The original Total Recall film was silly, but it had it’s moments. I don’t know quite what to make of this reboot, even after this new trailer:

Ok, fellas, first thing’s first. You can stop asking about the three-breasted prostitute, okay? There. She’s in the movie. Let’s move on. I can’t tell if this one will be a great PKD movie or a sub-par one. I’d love it to be good–full of PKD paranoia and questioning of reality–but so many PKD movies just become spectacles instead of good stories. And all that preaching aside, if it’s as fun as the original, I’ll probably end up seeing it.

And am I crazy, or does it look a little Minority Report-ish and a little Fifth Element-ish, particularly the cars? Anyway, what do you think?

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

New Total Recall Trailer

The new Total Recall trailer debuted online. If you are not familiar, this version has Colin Farell playing the role of Quaid instead of Arnold Schwarzeneggar. Presumably, there is still some link to the Philip K. Dick story “We Can Remember it for You Wholesale.” It also stars Jessica Biel, Bryan Cranston, Kate Beckinsale, Bill Nighy, and John Cho. It opens August 3.

What do you think? There’s no Mars in this one, and presumably no Kuato bursting forth from a guy’s stomach and no now-internet-famous extraordinarily endowed woman. That being said, the world building looks pretty interesting, if a little Fifth Element. Hopefully more details will emerge regarding the plot, but it looks like it could be a fun summer movie. Get your popcorn ready.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

What if…and “Time Cloaks”

There are a few stories going around today about a demonstration of a time cloak. You can read the New Scientist’s coverage here and Danger Room’s coverage here.

Now a lot of this science is well beyond me (if you want to read about the research, you can check out the scientists’ article in Nature magazine), but bear with me while I try to explain it. An invisibility cloak makes objects invisible by warping light such that light travels around the object–that way, no light is reflected back into your eyes (and you don’t see anything). A time cloak, on the other hand, messes with the speed of light that would (in theory) be reflected into our eyes, so that we do not perceive the object or action until after it’s already happened.

The experiment was done by a team led by Moti Fridman of Cornell University, with support from DARPA, and it involved shooting lasers through a fiber optic cable. They managed to hide an event for 40 picoseconds (trillionths of seconds). Now, we’re a HUGE way off from using time cloaks to hide bank robberies, murders, etc. But the experiment does demonstrate that it might be possible to send data covertly through fiber optic cables.

Of course, the mind first jumps to using a time cloak as a plot device in a thriller–a thief steals something valuable but the guards don’t know until later, or an assassin can cloak the firing of a bullet. Heck, even repo men and cops would love to grab an item or a person without others perceiving it in order to minimize potential dangers. Even if it’s limited to data transmission, time cloaks would make for a great story. Spies, identity thieves, bank robbers (the electronic kind, not the stick-em-up kind) would love to get their hands on this technology.

But what really got to me was thinking about a world in which these devices are common and large scale (i.e., not just for data transmission). What would that do to your mind if you couldn’t trust your perception? What if, when you witnessed something, you knew it wasn’t in fact happening in front of you, because it had already taken place (the light from an action that took place a while ago is only now getting to your eyes)? The doubt, the fear, the paranoia that would create. Things might go from puzzlement to panic very quickly if suddenly large numbers of people were experiencing the equivalent of hallucinations. Or would it lead to depression and fatalism? How would you act if you began to think what you are seeing is less than real? Would it cheapen reality, leading some people to act out?

This seems very much like a Philip K. Dick story to me. What do you think? What do you think of time cloaks?

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email

Grab Bag of Miscellany

First off, let me thank everyone who saw my comment on Bruce Schneir’s blog and checked out my site. I hope you liked what you found, and I hope you keep coming back.

Second, I have good news and bad news. The bad news is that my work project continues, and it’s keeping me super busy. So, the posting will be light. The good news is that the project has a deadline of tomorrow evening, so normal scheduling should return on Friday (and if you dislike my posts, I guess I have only bad news for you, but thanks for visiting anyway).

Third, because I hate to send you away with nothing, I have some goodies for you. As I wrote about yesterday, Asimov was a great writer not only because he was able to think creatively about technology, but also because his writing displayed his empathy. It seems like I may have been on to something because renowned author Ben Bova also wrote something similar about his own writing on the Clarion Foundation’s blog (yes, it posted yesterday, but I swear I didn’t read it until this morning).

And just in case Ben Bova isn’t enough, to tide you over during my long absence, I also point you toward this: a biography of Philip K. Dick on hilowbrow.com. It’s long enough that you may just finish it by the time I get back. Enjoy.

Submit to redditDigg ThisSubmit to StumbleUpon
Share via email